Although Lincoln's administrative area is highly urbanised, agriculture still occupies
a sizeable part
of it.
When the modern planning system was established in 1947, boosting food production
was a post-
war imperative and the agricultural industry was afforded wide exemptions from planning controls.
Since then, the priority attached to national food production has diminished, especially since entry
into the European Union, to the point where, for the first time this century, agricultural land is being
taken out of production and farmers encouraged to diversify their activities. Although controls have
been tightened over the years, often in response to specific issues (e.g. minimising livestock
keeping's impact on amenity), the planning system exercises less control over agricultural
development than is generally the case. Consequently, many agricultural buildings and structures
can still be put up without specific planning permission. Within these limitations, the City Council
must control development to protect amenity, whilst recognising the needs of modern farming.
Modern agricultural buildings and structures are often large and functional in design.
Insensitively
sited, they can damage landscape quality and visual amenity. They may dominate natural features
in a particular x area, or they may block or detract from important views into or out of the City, or,
impair its landscape setting. The City Council, therefore, welcomes policies to protect views of
Lincoln from areas beyond the City boundary adopted by the adjacent District Councils and by the
County Council in its review of the Structure Plan.
Diversification of Agriculture
National Planning Policy Guidance (PPG7: "The Countryside and Rural Economy")
recognises that
ongoing reform of the European Union's Common Agricultural Policy will have significant
ramifications for the economics of agricultural businesses and land use.
"Landowners
will need to look at a range of options for the economic use of their land,
including expanded woodland planting, recreation and leisure enterprises and the restoration
of damaged landscapes and habitats". (PPG7)
Initiatives to diversify agricultural enterprises may occur throughout the countryside,
in response to
the reform of agricultural policy. It is likely that many of these schemes will involve locations close
to urban areas - if only to take advantage of the concentration of potential customers. Uncontrolled,
diversification could introduce unacceptable disturbance into presently quiet areas or damage
Lincoln's landscape setting. For instance, many of the celebrated views of Lincoln are across open
farmland towards the historic, hill-top City. While the Cathedral and the rest of the historic City
may
take the eye, the quality of that landscape composition is heavily dependent upon the agricultural
foreground within which it sits. In particularly sensitive areas it may be desirable to bring
agricultural buildings under local planning control by making Article 4 Directions.
The main objectives of this Local Plan for agriculture are to ensure that farming
needs can be met
whilst:
the open appearance of agricultural land, is safeguarded;
existing agricultural buildings, which contribute in a positive way to landscape quality,
are retained and their character safeguarded (see a/so Policy 31: "Development Affecting
Buildings and Structures of Local Importance");
the essentially quiet character of these areas is maintained.
Within these general objectives, a wide range of alternative uses may be suitable
for existing
agricultural buildings. Extensions and alterations may be acceptable - provided they are needed to
achieve the change of use and do not detract from the existing building's character. New, free-
standing buildings, may be permitted where they are either ancillary to field based, open air leisure
or sporting activities, or are for a farm shop. In order to minimise the impact on visual amenity, new
buildings should be grouped, where possible, with existing buildings and their design and materials
should be compatible with them.
The Local Plan does not define the leisure and sporting activities likely to be approved
as part of
diversification proposals, primarily because demand for these activities is highly susceptible to
fashion and innovation.